PokornyPundit

Your source for opinion on news, politics, science, religion, media, and culture

Monday, March 28, 2005

Reflections on America's horrendous diet

After watching this evening's edition of World News Tonight on ABC, I was frightened to learn that Burger King has just unveiled a new 730-calorie breakfast sandwich. Judging from Burger King's website, with its flashy promotional campaign already up and running, they have joined the ranks of fast-food franchises, such as Hardee's, that have little shame in regards to their customers. With something like 2/3 of Americans obese as it is, why exactly do we need another monster product dished up with fries (or hash browns in this case)?

Of course, many Americans may put forth the personal freedom arguement. "It's my body and I can do whatever I want with it!" Fast-food companies play off of this too, putting a variety of options on the menu to further the concept of "consumer choice." Unfortunately, this statement is a contradiction of sorts when one considers that we all have to pay for health insurance. Dr. McDougall of TravelWizard.com wrote a very good article (I suggest you skim it, it is long but it contains some very good points) about how "responsible" Americans are paying for the actions of their fellow citizens that are choosing to wreck their bodies. I think he summed it up pretty well in this sentence:

Personally, I am tired of paying for someone else’s irresponsibility; drunks, smokers, and people who choose to be unhealthy by eating like royalty and failing to exercise, must no longer be allowed to put this financial burden on the “responsible minority.”

Amen to that.

So obviously people are aware of the problem, but how to go about fixing it is a whole 'nother ballgame. In June of last year, apparently there was a summit on obesity that attempted to address the issue in a concise manner. The only problem is there was little that could be agreed on in terms of where to put pressure points. Here are a few excerpts that caught my eye:

What is the role of government? We don’t all see eye-to-eye that that one either. Many here were disappointed to hear Secretary Thompson stress personal responsibility over government leadership. They were disappointed that his department’s initiatives were mainly small, low-budget steps, such as underfunded PSA programs, rather than big well-funded actions. And we just heard that there’s only a pathetic $2.7 million budget behind the department responsible for giving us the U.S. Dietary Guidelines and Food Pyramid program.

We heard about extraordinary nutritional overhauls going on in the schools of Texas, a state with a very high obesity rate, and those changes reflect the effort of one government official: state agricultural commissioner Susan Combs. She has shown what strong government leadership can do.

Speaking of the Health Insurance Industry

We heard about a promising new pilot program from Aetna called Healthy Body, Healthy Weight, that breaks new ground in helping overweight patients and reimbursing primary care doctors for time spent on this. We heard suggestions to build financial incentives into our health insurance systems so that companies and individuals reap benefits from changing to a healthier lifestyle, diet and weight. How about a pilot program on that?

So basically, there is a lot that needs to be addressed. Let's just hope that America (in whatever form, socially or politically) faces this problem head-on before it's too late.

3 Comments:

  • At 10:49 AM, Blogger Robert Taylor said…

    Granted that a conglomerate the size of McDonalds or Burger King are a special exception, I know it's going to kill you to hear me say that to any other company, they really don't have an obligation to their "customers". It's not even fathomable the amount of calories that ethnic foods be it Mexican, Chinese, Indian have. And we've been eating it for years. The truth is that the responsibility lies in the consumer, not the producer.

     
  • At 7:28 PM, Blogger Remz Pokorny said…

    I won't argue that some ethnic foods are high in calories, but the availability of those particular products is another issue. There is no way the average Mexican could afford eating two or three high-calorie burritos (or whatever) a day, but these fast-food companies are making these kinds of things affordable to the average American. Of course, there is a lot that has to do with consumer responsibility (heck, you're a liberal, man! you guys are all about blaming the corporations), but I mean really, why the hell do we need stuff like the ENORMOUS OMLETTE SANDWICH?? It's the quick buck, that's all it is. This is one of the fundamental flaws of capitalism in my opinion.

     
  • At 10:19 PM, Blogger Robert Taylor said…

    I also see where you're coming from. But like you said, a quick buck is a quick buck, but it's you're choice wether you choose to spend that buck and where. They could very easily spend the same amount of money and go to Subway. And as for the Mexican food. A burrito has a steak (not ground beef) and can be bought for as little as 2 dollars. Should people be informed of the calories. I say yes. But then it's up to them.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home